Skip to main content

Spyder (A really nice python IDE)

I've started using Spyder recently and I really like it.



The features I enjoy the most are
  • Quick response. PyCharm is great but has a tendency to freeze up on me. It' my fault - I have a lot of applications open at the same time and I switch between them. PyCharm has a lot of useful stuff going on beneath the hood, so there are many processes that swap in and out when I switch, but I relish the speed of Spyder now.
  • There is a Mac .dmg which I can just download and install
  • What I really like is the ability to patch into a running Ipython kernel and run code from inside the IDE
  • I can just fire up a new file and code right away without having to create a project etc etc. But I can still make files parts of projects if I want.
The things I miss (and PyCharm does really well):
  • There is no git integration (and the creators say they won't do it). I completely understand this decision and it's not a problem, but PyCharm has the git integration down SO well, it's hard to do without. 
  • PyCharm will analyze your code to the extent that it will give you hints to keyword arguments for your functions. I LOVE this. I NEED this. Spyder will display the function help, which is OK.
  • PyCharm will auto complete functions defined in the current context. I have come to rely on this to speed up my coding. Spyder makes you type out the whole function name (though it will do dot completion)
  •  PyCharm will analyze imports from your libraries and auto complete on that, Spyder does not.
Spyder is also rough around the edges - the user interface will freeze sometimes in unpredictable ways, so some work is needed there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A note on Python's __exit__() and errors

Python's context managers are a very neat way of handling code that needs a teardown once you are done. Python objects have do have a destructor method ( __del__ ) called right before the last instance of the object is about to be destroyed. You can do a teardown there. However there is a lot of fine print to the __del__ method. A cleaner way of doing tear-downs is through Python's context manager , manifested as the with keyword. class CrushMe: def __init__(self): self.f = open('test.txt', 'w') def foo(self, a, b): self.f.write(str(a - b)) def __enter__(self): return self def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb): self.f.close() return True with CrushMe() as c: c.foo(2, 3) One thing that is important, and that got me just now, is error handling. I made the mistake of ignoring all those 'junk' arguments ( exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb ). I just skimmed the docs and what popped out is that you need to return True or

Store numpy arrays in sqlite

Use numpy.getbuffer (or sqlite3.Binary ) in combination with numpy.frombuffer to lug numpy data in and out of the sqlite3 database: import sqlite3, numpy r1d = numpy.random.randn(10) con = sqlite3.connect(':memory:') con.execute("CREATE TABLE eye(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, desc TEXT, data BLOB)") con.execute("INSERT INTO eye(desc,data) VALUES(?,?)", ("1d", sqlite3.Binary(r1d))) con.execute("INSERT INTO eye(desc,data) VALUES(?,?)", ("1d", numpy.getbuffer(r1d))) res = con.execute("SELECT * FROM eye").fetchall() con.close() #res -> #[(1, u'1d', <read-write buffer ptr 0x10371b220, size 80 at 0x10371b1e0>), # (2, u'1d', <read-write buffer ptr 0x10371b190, size 80 at 0x10371b150>)] print r1d - numpy.frombuffer(res[0][2]) #->[ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.] print r1d - numpy.frombuffer(res[1][2]) #->[ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0.] Note that for work where data ty