Skip to main content

Python subprocess, Popen and PIPE

Typically when using Python's subprocess we use PIPEs to communicate with the process. However, it turns out, PIPEs suck when the data gets even slightly large (somewhere in the vicinity of 16K). You can verify this by running the following test code:
from subprocess import Popen, PIPE
import argparse, time

def execute(n):
  p = Popen(['python', 'test.py', '-n', str(n)], stdin=PIPE, stdout=PIPE, stderr=PIPE)
  p.wait()
  return p.stdout.read().splitlines()

if __name__ == "__main__":
  parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
  parser.add_argument('-n', type=int)
  args = parser.parse_args()
  if args.n is not None:
    print '0'*args.n
  else:
    for n in [10,100,1000,10000,12000,16000,16200, 16500]:
      t0 = time.clock()
      execute(n)
      print n, time.clock() - t0
The output is
10 0.001219
100 0.001254
1000 0.001162
10000 0.001362
12000 0.001429
16000 0.001305
16200 0.00121
(Hangs after this)
The way to handle this is to generate a temporary file and let the process write to the file. A detailed note can be found here.
def execute_long(n):
  with open('query.txt','w') as stdout:
    p = Popen(['python', 'test.py', '-n', str(n)], stdin=PIPE, stdout=stdout, stderr=PIPE)
    p.wait()
  with open('query.txt','r') as stdout:
    return stdout.read().splitlines()

if __name__ == "__main__":
  parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
  parser.add_argument('-n', type=int)
  args = parser.parse_args()
  if args.n is not None:
    print '0'*args.n
  else:
    for n in [10,100,1000,10000,12000,16000,16200, 16500]:
      t0 = time.clock()
      execute_long(n)
      print n, time.clock() - t0
10 0.001601
100 0.001263
1000 0.001272
10000 0.001404
12000 0.001419
16000 0.001333
32000 0.001445
64000 0.001692
128000 0.001763

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Python: Multiprocessing: passing multiple arguments to a function

Write a wrapper function to unpack the arguments before calling the real function. Lambda won't work, for some strange un-Pythonic reason.


import multiprocessing as mp def myfun(a,b): print a + b def mf_wrap(args): return myfun(*args) p = mp.Pool(4) fl = [(a,b) for a in range(3) for b in range(2)] #mf_wrap = lambda args: myfun(*args) -> this sucker, though more pythonic and compact, won't work p.map(mf_wrap, fl)

Flowing text in inkscape (Poster making)

You can flow text into arbitrary shapes in inkscape. (From a hint here).

You simply create a text box, type your text into it, create a frame with some drawing tool, select both the text box and the frame (click and shift) and then go to text->flow into frame.

UPDATE:

The omnipresent anonymous asked:
Trying to enter sentence so that text forms the number three...any ideas?
The solution:
Type '3' using the text toolConvert to path using object->pathSize as necessaryRemove fillUngroupType in actual text in new text boxSelect the text and the '3' pathFlow the text

Drawing circles using matplotlib

Use the pylab.Circle command

import pylab #Imports matplotlib and a host of other useful modules cir1 = pylab.Circle((0,0), radius=0.75, fc='y') #Creates a patch that looks like a circle (fc= face color) cir2 = pylab.Circle((.5,.5), radius=0.25, alpha =.2, fc='b') #Repeat (alpha=.2 means make it very translucent) ax = pylab.axes(aspect=1) #Creates empty axes (aspect=1 means scale things so that circles look like circles) ax.add_patch(cir1) #Grab the current axes, add the patch to it ax.add_patch(cir2) #Repeat pylab.show()