Skip to main content

Docopt is amazing

I love the command line and I love Python. So, naturally, I am an avid user of the argparse module bundled with Python. Today I discovered docopt and I am so totally converted. argparse is great but there is a bunch of setup code that you have to write and often things look very boilerplate-y and messy and it just looks like there should be a more concise way of expressing the command line interface to a program. Enter docopt

docopt allows you to describe your commandline interface in your doc string and then it parses this description and creates a command line parser that returns a dictionary with the values for all the options filled in. Just like that.

So, for example, one of my scripts has a docstring that looks like

Usage:
  compute_eye_epoch [-R DATAROOT] [-x EXCEL] [-d DATABASE] [-e EPOCH] [-f|-F] [-q]

Options:
  -h --help     Show this screen and exit.
  -R DATAROOT   Root of data directory [default: ../../Data]
  -x EXCEL      Spreadsheet with sessions/trials etc [default: ../../Notes/sessions_and_neurons.xlsx]
  -d DATABASE   sqlite3 database we write to [default: test.sqlite3]
  -e EPOCH      Name of epoch we want to process
  -f            Force recomputation of all entries for this epoch
  -F            Force storing of epoch (automatically forces recomputation)
  -q            Quiet mode (print only ERROR level logger messages)

And the __main__ part of the code is

import docopt

if __name__ == '__main__':
  arguments = docopt.docopt(__doc__, version='v1')
  print arguments

If I call the program with -h then I get the usage information printed and the program exits. If I call it with other options args will be filled out, for example:

{'-F': False,
 '-R': '../../Data',
 '-d': 'test.sqlite3',
 '-e': None,
 '-f': False,
 '-q': False,
 '-x': '../../Notes/sessions_and_neurons.xlsx'}

This totally removes the barrier to creating command line interfaces and removes clutter from the __main__ section of the code! Amazing! Give it a try!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A note on Python's __exit__() and errors

Python's context managers are a very neat way of handling code that needs a teardown once you are done. Python objects have do have a destructor method ( __del__ ) called right before the last instance of the object is about to be destroyed. You can do a teardown there. However there is a lot of fine print to the __del__ method. A cleaner way of doing tear-downs is through Python's context manager , manifested as the with keyword. class CrushMe: def __init__(self): self.f = open('test.txt', 'w') def foo(self, a, b): self.f.write(str(a - b)) def __enter__(self): return self def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb): self.f.close() return True with CrushMe() as c: c.foo(2, 3) One thing that is important, and that got me just now, is error handling. I made the mistake of ignoring all those 'junk' arguments ( exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb ). I just skimmed the docs and what popped out is that you need to return True or...

Remove field code from Word document

e.g. before submitting a MS, or hand manipulating some formatting because Word does things (like cross-references) so half-assed [from here ] Select all the text (CTRL-A) Press Ctrl+Shift+F9 Editing to remove anonymous comments that only contain thanks. I really appreciate the thanks, but it makes it harder to find comments that carry pertinent information. I'm also going to try and paste informative comments in the body of the post to make them easier to find.

h5py and multiprocessing

The HDF5 format has been working awesome for me, but I ran into danger when I started to mix it with multiprocessing. It was the worst kind of danger: the intermittent error. Here are the dangers/issues in order of escalation (TL;DR is use a generator to feed data from your file into the child processes as they spawn. It's the easiest way. Read on for harder ways.) An h5py file handle can't be pickled and therefore can't be passed as an argument using pool.map() If you set the handle as a global and access it from the child processes you run the risk of racing which leads to corrupted reads. My personal runin was that my code sometimes ran fine but sometimes would complain that there are NaNs or Infinity in the data. This wasted some time tracking down. Other people have had this kind of problem [ 1 ]. Same problem if you pass the filename and have the different processes open individual instances of the file separately. The hard way to solve this problem is to sw...