Big data is sometimes described as data whose size is larger than your available RAM. I think that this is a good criterion because once the size of your data (or the size of any results of computing on your data) start to approach your RAM size you have to start worrying about how you are going to manage memory. If you leave it up to your OS you are going to be writing and reading to disk in somewhat unpredictable ways and depending on the software you use, your program might just quit with no warning or with a courtesy 'Out of memory' message. The fun challenge of "Big Data" is, of course, how to keep doing computations regardless of the size of your data and not have your computer quit on you. Some calculations can be done in a blocked fashion but some calculations require you to access different parts of the data all at once.
Python's mmap module is an excellent way to let someone else do the dirty work of handling data files that are comparable or larger than available memory.
Here the .smalla data files are simply somewhat large files that can be loaded into memory (which we do for illustration purposes) but which we'd rather not. Running this code with memory_profiler
tells us:
As we can see from the 'increment' column, when we map the data we hardly use any memory at all compared to the 128 MB that we heat up when we load the data into memory at once.
We should keep in mind that we have traded off space for time here. Even with a SSD operating on data from disk is going to take much longer than operating on data that is all in memory, but at least we are able to do it.
Now, if you want both fast access and operability with limited RAM, you need a much larger bag of tricks which I don't have and which often heavily depends on tricks you can do with your particular data.
Python's mmap module is an excellent way to let someone else do the dirty work of handling data files that are comparable or larger than available memory.
import mmap import numpy @profile def load_data(): fin = open('../Data/human_chrom_11.smalla', 'r+b') x = fin.read() y = x[numpy.random.randint(0,len(x))] print y @profile def map_data(): fin = open('../Data/human_chrom_11.smalla', 'r+b') x = mmap.mmap(fin.fileno(), 0) y = x[numpy.random.randint(0,len(x))] print y load_data() map_data()
Here the .smalla data files are simply somewhat large files that can be loaded into memory (which we do for illustration purposes) but which we'd rather not. Running this code with memory_profiler
python -m memory_profiler test.py
tells us:
Filename: test.py Line # Mem usage Increment Line Contents ================================================ 5 16.922 MiB 0.000 MiB @profile 6 def load_data(): 7 16.926 MiB 0.004 MiB fin = open('../Data/human_chrom_11.smalla', 'r+b') 8 145.680 MiB 128.754 MiB x = fin.read() 9 145.691 MiB 0.012 MiB y = x[numpy.random.randint(0,len(x))] 10 145.691 MiB 0.000 MiB print y Filename: test.py Line # Mem usage Increment Line Contents ================================================ 12 16.941 MiB 0.000 MiB @profile 13 def map_data(): 14 16.941 MiB 0.000 MiB fin = open('../Data/human_chrom_11.smalla', 'r+b') 15 16.945 MiB 0.004 MiB x = mmap.mmap(fin.fileno(), 0) 16 16.953 MiB 0.008 MiB y = x[numpy.random.randint(0,len(x))] 17 16.953 MiB 0.000 MiB print y
As we can see from the 'increment' column, when we map the data we hardly use any memory at all compared to the 128 MB that we heat up when we load the data into memory at once.
We should keep in mind that we have traded off space for time here. Even with a SSD operating on data from disk is going to take much longer than operating on data that is all in memory, but at least we are able to do it.
Now, if you want both fast access and operability with limited RAM, you need a much larger bag of tricks which I don't have and which often heavily depends on tricks you can do with your particular data.
Comments
Post a Comment