Skip to main content

Passing on the MacBook Air

Looked into Apple Macintosh Laptop computers, as the new lab is a mac lab and decided to pass on the MacBook Air.

In comparison to the MacBook I found
Pros:
  1. Light - 3 pounds (vs 5 pounds for Macbook and my current HP DV2210us)
  2. Illuminated keyboard
Cons:
  1. Max memory is 2Gb (vs 4Gb)
  2. Max CPU brawn 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo (vs 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo)
  3. 80GB 4200-rpm 1.8in HDD (vs 250 GB 5400-rpm 2.5in HDD)
  4. No optical drive (vs 8x DVD burner)
  5. 1 USB 2.0 and NO firewire (vs 2 USB 2.0 and 1 firewire)
  6. No ethernet port
  7. The power connector and the USB slots open out awkwardly from the case base [engadget]
Mostly, this machine will be plugged into a keyboard, a large monitor and will sit on a desk doing number crunching and paper writing (Macs do all the work for you, right, not like PCs where you actually have to write the paper yourself). I imagined the awkwardness with which the MacBook Air would sit, with no ethernet cable, always relying on a wireless network, even for DVD burning/loading, with that side slot half propped open because I want to use a flash drive to move a file. So I decided to go with a fully muscled up MacBook that is as small (the tabletop size is just a bit smaller than the Air), slightly heavier, and has double the memory and triple the harddisk, and infinite times more firewire and ethernet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A note on Python's __exit__() and errors

Python's context managers are a very neat way of handling code that needs a teardown once you are done. Python objects have do have a destructor method ( __del__ ) called right before the last instance of the object is about to be destroyed. You can do a teardown there. However there is a lot of fine print to the __del__ method. A cleaner way of doing tear-downs is through Python's context manager , manifested as the with keyword. class CrushMe: def __init__(self): self.f = open('test.txt', 'w') def foo(self, a, b): self.f.write(str(a - b)) def __enter__(self): return self def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb): self.f.close() return True with CrushMe() as c: c.foo(2, 3) One thing that is important, and that got me just now, is error handling. I made the mistake of ignoring all those 'junk' arguments ( exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb ). I just skimmed the docs and what popped out is that you need to return True or...

Remove field code from Word document

e.g. before submitting a MS, or hand manipulating some formatting because Word does things (like cross-references) so half-assed [from here ] Select all the text (CTRL-A) Press Ctrl+Shift+F9 Editing to remove anonymous comments that only contain thanks. I really appreciate the thanks, but it makes it harder to find comments that carry pertinent information. I'm also going to try and paste informative comments in the body of the post to make them easier to find.

h5py and multiprocessing

The HDF5 format has been working awesome for me, but I ran into danger when I started to mix it with multiprocessing. It was the worst kind of danger: the intermittent error. Here are the dangers/issues in order of escalation (TL;DR is use a generator to feed data from your file into the child processes as they spawn. It's the easiest way. Read on for harder ways.) An h5py file handle can't be pickled and therefore can't be passed as an argument using pool.map() If you set the handle as a global and access it from the child processes you run the risk of racing which leads to corrupted reads. My personal runin was that my code sometimes ran fine but sometimes would complain that there are NaNs or Infinity in the data. This wasted some time tracking down. Other people have had this kind of problem [ 1 ]. Same problem if you pass the filename and have the different processes open individual instances of the file separately. The hard way to solve this problem is to sw...