Skip to main content

Matto3 and Matto4 *almost* make it to my favourite list

What I really enjoyed about FarCry was the stealth element. My favorite weapons are the sniper rifle and the silenced machine pistol. I enjoy well made maps, good atmosphere and well, stealth.

I hate "boss" fights, be they with "Bosses" or large numbers of enemies at the same time, out in the open. I also hate Trigens, but that's a good kind of hate.

So Matto3 and Matto4 almost made it for me, with Matto3 beating Matto4 except for the incomplete nature of Matto3's story.

Matto3: The good
  1. Silenced pistol with scope! Heaven!
  2. Lots and lots of humor scattered around.
  3. AWESOME maps. Really. Absolute top-notch crafting of textures, objects etc.
  4. Some innovative aspects, like shooting gas cylinder valves to turn them into rockets
  5. Some manipulation of the environment
  6. Multiple routes, to an extent
  7. Matrix style slow mo!
  8. No trigens

Matto3: The bad
  1. Incomplete - not really bad.
  2. Boss fight at a certain level
  3. No sniper rifle
  4. Jack Carvers voice acting. Sorry, even if I allow him to be British (quite suddenly, an ethnicity transplant as it were), that's not a native British accent.
Matto4: The good
  1. same as Matto3, except, see below.

Matto4: The bad
  1. Dude, where's my sniper rifle?
  2. Dude, where's my suppressed machine pistol?
  3. Dude, what's with all these Boss fights?
So, all in all Matto3,4 will appeal to most FarCry players, except those who want a stealth option.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A note on Python's __exit__() and errors

Python's context managers are a very neat way of handling code that needs a teardown once you are done. Python objects have do have a destructor method ( __del__ ) called right before the last instance of the object is about to be destroyed. You can do a teardown there. However there is a lot of fine print to the __del__ method. A cleaner way of doing tear-downs is through Python's context manager , manifested as the with keyword. class CrushMe: def __init__(self): self.f = open('test.txt', 'w') def foo(self, a, b): self.f.write(str(a - b)) def __enter__(self): return self def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb): self.f.close() return True with CrushMe() as c: c.foo(2, 3) One thing that is important, and that got me just now, is error handling. I made the mistake of ignoring all those 'junk' arguments ( exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb ). I just skimmed the docs and what popped out is that you need to return True or...

Remove field code from Word document

e.g. before submitting a MS, or hand manipulating some formatting because Word does things (like cross-references) so half-assed [from here ] Select all the text (CTRL-A) Press Ctrl+Shift+F9 Editing to remove anonymous comments that only contain thanks. I really appreciate the thanks, but it makes it harder to find comments that carry pertinent information. I'm also going to try and paste informative comments in the body of the post to make them easier to find.

h5py and multiprocessing

The HDF5 format has been working awesome for me, but I ran into danger when I started to mix it with multiprocessing. It was the worst kind of danger: the intermittent error. Here are the dangers/issues in order of escalation (TL;DR is use a generator to feed data from your file into the child processes as they spawn. It's the easiest way. Read on for harder ways.) An h5py file handle can't be pickled and therefore can't be passed as an argument using pool.map() If you set the handle as a global and access it from the child processes you run the risk of racing which leads to corrupted reads. My personal runin was that my code sometimes ran fine but sometimes would complain that there are NaNs or Infinity in the data. This wasted some time tracking down. Other people have had this kind of problem [ 1 ]. Same problem if you pass the filename and have the different processes open individual instances of the file separately. The hard way to solve this problem is to sw...