Skip to main content

Thunderbird local folder tags redux : It can be done!

  1. Compacting a folder adds the X-Mozilla-Keys: header if it does not exist [mozillazine],[googlegroups thread],[bugzilla].
  2. You can force a folder compact by deleting an (unimportant) email and then compacting the folder. (Just clicking compact will do nothing to a folder if there is nothing to be deleted).
  3. Thunderbird, once it sees the X-Mozilla-Keys: header, will actually use it to store tags.
  4. You can verify this by deleting the .msf file and seeing if the tagging persists
  5. You can now move this email around (from inside Thunderbird) and the tags move with the email, even to a folder that, in general, does not have the X-Mozilla-Keys: header! True metadata.
  6. You can tag a folder that doesn't have the X-Mozilla-Keys: header and afterwards compact it and Thunderbird will move the tags into the header. Just make sure you really compact the folder (pt 2. above)
  7. Thunderbird stores tag definitions (highlight color etc.) in prefs.js
Good, now I can continue with my tagging of archived mail...
Labels:

Comments

  1. JohnOctober 3, 2009 at 3:16 PM

    Interesting!
    What about subfolders? If I delete an email in folder Local Folders>Inbox>John and compact Local Folder, will Thunderbird compact ALL folders that are a subfolder of Local Folders such as Local Folders>Sent>Smith?

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousNovember 30, 2009 at 11:13 PM

    First of all, thanks for the tip! It solved my problem of migrating tags to another mail client!

    @John: Unfortunately, no. Each subfolder has its own mailbox file (or so I'm told), and you'll need to compact each folder individually.
    I did exactly that, yesterday.

    Also, I found a less destructive way to force compaction - you don't need to delete a mail, it suffices to just move a mail to another folder (e.g. a temporary empty one) and then move it back (and click Compact of course).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note on Python's __exit__() and errors

Python's context managers are a very neat way of handling code that needs a teardown once you are done. Python objects have do have a destructor method ( __del__ ) called right before the last instance of the object is about to be destroyed. You can do a teardown there. However there is a lot of fine print to the __del__ method. A cleaner way of doing tear-downs is through Python's context manager , manifested as the with keyword. class CrushMe: def __init__(self): self.f = open('test.txt', 'w') def foo(self, a, b): self.f.write(str(a - b)) def __enter__(self): return self def __exit__(self, exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb): self.f.close() return True with CrushMe() as c: c.foo(2, 3) One thing that is important, and that got me just now, is error handling. I made the mistake of ignoring all those 'junk' arguments ( exc_type, exc_val, exc_tb ). I just skimmed the docs and what popped out is that you need to return True or...
Post a Comment
Read more

Remove field code from Word document

e.g. before submitting a MS, or hand manipulating some formatting because Word does things (like cross-references) so half-assed [from here ] Select all the text (CTRL-A) Press Ctrl+Shift+F9 Editing to remove anonymous comments that only contain thanks. I really appreciate the thanks, but it makes it harder to find comments that carry pertinent information. I'm also going to try and paste informative comments in the body of the post to make them easier to find.
24 comments
Read more

h5py and multiprocessing

The HDF5 format has been working awesome for me, but I ran into danger when I started to mix it with multiprocessing. It was the worst kind of danger: the intermittent error. Here are the dangers/issues in order of escalation (TL;DR is use a generator to feed data from your file into the child processes as they spawn. It's the easiest way. Read on for harder ways.) An h5py file handle can't be pickled and therefore can't be passed as an argument using pool.map() If you set the handle as a global and access it from the child processes you run the risk of racing which leads to corrupted reads. My personal runin was that my code sometimes ran fine but sometimes would complain that there are NaNs or Infinity in the data. This wasted some time tracking down. Other people have had this kind of problem [ 1 ]. Same problem if you pass the filename and have the different processes open individual instances of the file separately. The hard way to solve this problem is to sw...
Post a Comment
Read more